Fingermark quality: A survey of examiners and researchers
Teneil Hanna,Sebastien Moret, Scott Chadwick
See also the instructional videos on "Fingerprint Comparison"
Abstract
The primary aim of fingermark research is to advance the quantity and quality of fingermarks detected using novel techniques or improvements on existing methods. Subsequently, there is a need to evaluate these methods to determine the quality of the developed mark, which is mostly done by the use of a numerical scale with descriptors to assist in the evaluation. However, this evaluation is often complicated due to a wide range of variables that impact the way quality assessment is performed. This is particularly true when considering it is currently unknown what assessment parameters are required to encompass the overall definition of quality. Likewise, the definition of fingermark quality is not universally agreed upon, which leads to significant subjective interpretation when a researcher chooses a scale. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors contributing to fingermark quality in order to generate a deeper understanding of current approaches and definitions. A survey was created through a dataset that consisted of over 500 fingermarks detected in controlled laboratory conditions with a range of techniques. The images selected for the survey were based upon representing a full range of quality, each with a varying range of attributes. The survey looked at different parameters and descriptions used in current assessment protocols, asked participants to grade marks based on chosen parameters, and investigated current chosen methods by researchers in fingermark definition. The survey relied upon the participation of both examiners and researchers in fingermark detection. The results indicate that quality assessment methods implemented by researchers are not utilising all parameters that fingermark researchers and examiners deem important. This is especially true for contrast and background development, considered as two of the top parameters by examiners and researchers, which are not regularly used in most quality scale assessment methods. The survey ultimately demonstrated that the current subjective quality assessment methods were not always suitable and highlighted more appropriate parameters and descriptors that should be considered when assessing the quality of a fingermark.
Highlights- Survey of researchers and examiners about fingermark quality evaluation.
- Ridge detail, flow, visibility, contrast, technique development most important parameters.
- Current scales often don’t utilise parameters assessors consider important.
- Continuous grading is too variable in comparison to traditional categorical scales.
- Assessors’ experience should be stated to help study cross-comparison.
Read the report:
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original work is properly cited and not changed in any way.