Introduction

Crime scene reconstruction is the process of determining the events involved with a crime using the physical evidence present at the scene along with scientific methodology and deductive reasoning. Various techniques are used as part of this reconstruction process; including DNA evaluation, fingerprint identification, and the focus of this project, blood spatter analysis. In blood spatter analysis, the residual bloodstains left at the scene of a crime are used to determine the point of origin of a particular bloodletting event and the type of trauma that led to the bloodstain (e.g., gunshot, blunt force, sharp object, etc.). The determination of these factors assists crime-scene analysts in their efforts to establish the sequence of events that occurred during the crime.

Figure 1: Typical bloodstain patterns.
(Top) Near normal impact showing spines and satellite drops. (Bottom) Oblique impact to the right showing length and width measurements of the elliptical portion of the bloodstain.

Two typical bloodstains are shown in Figure 1. It is known that the size and shape of a bloodstain are caused by some of the physical conditions of the blood droplet at the point and time of impact and the roughness of the impact surface. Stain size is quantitatively described as the area of the stain's circular or elliptical shape, whereas shape is quantified by the stain's aspect ratio as well as the number of spines and satellite drops around the stain contour. A spine is a disruption in the smooth periphery of a stain whereas a satellite drop is a small drop that has completely separated from the main droplet and has landed away from the main bloodstain, i.e., a small splash.

Within this general framework of using the bloodstain size and shape to determine the blood droplet impact conditions, a number of different models and tools are used in the field. The use of specific correlations, strategies, software, etc. is dependent on the resources available to an examiner, which in turn are impacted by where and for whom the examiner works. As an example, the simplest technique is called stringing. This method starts by using the aspect ratio of a bloodstain Ar to determine the impact angle a of the blood droplet using the relation

where the impact angle a is measured from the plane of the impact surface and the width W and the length L of the bloodstain are indicated in the bottom image in Figure 1. Balthazard, Piedelivre, Desoille and DeRobert proposed this relationship in 1939 based on their experimental work, and it has become the predominant correlation in forensics analysis. Using this relationship, a ray is typically drawn in a straight line from the stain in the direction of the angle a. Repeating this process for a large number of individual droplet stains in a blood spatter pattern, the individual rays may converge in a nexus, or region of convergence. The point of origin of the bloodletting event is presumed to be this nexus. Additionally, under this method the speed of the droplet is determined by the size of the stain and the assumption that the volume of the blood droplet was "normal", where a "normal" droplet is defined as one containing 0.05 mL of blood. This technique assumes that all stains are created by droplets of equal volume.

< Read the complete article >

Related articles

• Reliability Assessment of Current Methods in Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
• Using Multiple Void Patterns at Crime Scenes to Estimate Area of Origin in Bloodstain Cases
• Quantitative Analysis of High Velocity Bloodstain Patterns
• The Fluorescein Method of Latent Blood Detection
• Collection and Preservation of Blood Evidence from Crime Scenes