The University of Tennessee Body Farm, formally known as the Anthropology Research Facility, is a 2.5-acre wooded property where researchers have been studying decomposition in a variety of natural settings since 1981. This research helps us better understand how bodies break down and what may affect that process. It is essential for estimating time of death which, according to National Institute of Justice’s physical scientist Danielle McLeod-Henning “is one of the most important issues to address in any death investigation. Estimation of the postmortem interval can aid in identification of remains, and in cases of foul play, identifying potential suspects and confirming alibis.”
Recently, the researchers noticed an interesting phenomenon. Human bodies donated for study and placed in the same environment at the exact same time were decomposing at different rates. Specifically, they noted:
The characteristics of the deceased bodies appeared to enhance or disrupt decomposition. This caused the researchers to question the accuracy of time since death approximations — or the postmortem interval — based on human and insect evidence. They determined that those estimates may contain more errors than has been previously estimated.
Dawnie Steadman, director of the Forensic Anthropology Center and an anthropology professor, and colleagues at the University of Tennessee hypothesized that drugs found in decomposing bodies could have an influence on the behaviors of decomposers and result in differential rates of decomposition. Their study systematically examined the relationships between decomposition and of end-of-life diseases and the drugs (over the counter, prescription, and illicit) in donors’ systems.
Dr. Steadman’s group analyzed the relationship between a donor’s drug use, end-of-life diseases, and their decomposition dynamics, which are affected by the behavior and presence of scavengers, insects, and intestinal microbes (Figure 1). The researchers wanted to know if drug use altered the expected decomposition rate or introduced unknown error to the estimate of the postmortem interval.
For 22 donor bodies representing various causes of death, the researchers compared the toxicological drug screens of the cadavers to drugs found in their associated decomposition fluid, insect larvae, and soil samples. (Figure 2).
Dr. Steadman’s team asked if drug use could be tracked across systems that affect:
The researchers found that they could accurately track drugs that were initially present in donor blood serum to the insects, decomposition fluid, and soil associated with that individual. Figure 3 shows an example of morphine presence in serum, larvae, decomposition fluid, and soil.
The researchers also found that they could correlate changes in insect and microbe community structure and physiology with donor end-of-life diseases and their associated drug treatments. These drug treatments, in turn, affect the overall rate of decomposition. Of note:
“This NIJ-funded study delved into the complexities associated with postmortem interval estimation, and the many variables that must be considered,” said Danielle McLeod-Henning.
Although preliminary analysis revealed no statistically significant correlation between end-of-life condition, toxicology, and the accuracy of time since death estimates, the researchers identified patterns that indicate a donor’s drug use influences soil, microbe, and insect characteristics.
This research may ultimately inform how postmortem interval estimates should be modified in the presence of certain drugs. It could also inform the need to perform toxicological testing of different matrices prior to estimating the time since death.